违反了 PRIMARY KEY 约束 'PK_t_counter'。不能在对象 'dbo.t_counter' 中插入重复键。 语句已终止。 3种不同遥感辐射产品的精度比较-A Comparative Study on Three Types of Remote Sensing Solar Radiation Products
doi:  10.3878/j.issn.1006-9585.2017.17038
3种不同遥感辐射产品的精度比较

A Comparative Study on Three Types of Remote Sensing Solar Radiation Products
摘要点击 156  全文点击 163  投稿时间:2017-03-10  
查看HTML全文   下载PDF   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
基金:  国家自然科学基金项目41261016,西北师范大学青年教师科研能力提升计划项目NWNU-LKQN-14-4
中文关键词:  向下短波辐射  正弦曲线模型  GEWEX-SRB辐射产品  CERES-EBAF辐射产品  GLASS-DSR辐射产品
英文关键词:  Downward shortwave radiation  Sinusoidal model  GEWEX-SRB radiation product  CERES-EBAF radiation product  GLASS-DSR radiation product
     
作者中文名作者英文名单位
李净LI Jing西北师范大学地理与环境科学学院, 兰州 730070
王丹WANG Dan西北师范大学地理与环境科学学院, 兰州 730070
引用:李净,王丹.2018.3种不同遥感辐射产品的精度比较[J].气候与环境研究,23(2):252-258,doi:10.3878/j.issn.1006-9585.2017.17038.
Citation:LI Jing,WANG Dan.2018.A Comparative Study on Three Types of Remote Sensing Solar Radiation Products[J].Climatic and Environmental Research(in Chinese),23(2):252-258,doi:10.3878/j.issn.1006-9585.2017.17038.
中文摘要:
      遥感辐射产品的验证研究主要集中在单一产品在青藏高原地区和实测数据的比较分析上,缺乏产品之间的相互比较从而无法得知产品的适用性,因此针对整个中国地区对这些产品的适用性进行系统性的比较研究。选取了数据序列较完整的GEWEX-SRB(Global Energy and Water Cycle Experiment-Surface Radiation Budget)、CERES-EBAF(Clouds and Earth's Radiant Energy Systems-Energy Balanced and Filled)和GLASS-DSR(Global LAnd Surface Satellite-Downward Shortwave Radiation)3种辐射产品,以相关系数、平均偏差、均方根误差为评价指标在整个中国区域范围内进行精度评价,并且对其精度的时空分布特征进行了研究。研究表明,2000~2007年GEWEX-SRB与CERES-EBAF相比两者具有相似的偏差趋势,低估和高估最严重站点同为峨眉山站和太原站,总体上CERES-EBAF的精度更高。2008~2010年间GLASS-DSR与CERES-EBAF进行对比结果表明CERES-EBAF精度要高。总体来说,这3种辐射产品的精度都较高,低估的站点大多地处高海拔地区,其中CERES-EBAF产品时间序列长且精度相对较高,尤其是在中东部及大部分沿海地区精度较高。
Abstract:
      The verification of remote sensing radiation products mainly focuses on comparative analyses of single products and measured data in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau region. The lack of comparison between the products make it hard to determine the applicability of these products. Therefore, a systematic comparative study of the applicability of these products in China is conducted in the present study. GEWEX-SRB (Global Energy and Water Cycle Experiment-Surface Radiation Budget), CERES-EBAF (Clouds and Earth's Radiant Energy Systems-Energy Balanced and Filled), and GLASS-DSR (Global LAnd Surface Satellite-Downward Shortwave Radiation) radiation products are chosen to verify their accuracy. The correlation coefficient, the mean bias error, and root mean square error are taken as evaluation indexes, and the accuracy of the temporal and spatial distribution of these products in China is discussed. GEWEX-SRB and CERES-EBAF over the period from 2000 to 2007 are compared and analyzed. Results indicate both of them have the same overestimation and underestimation tendencies. The most severe underestimation and overestimation both occur at Mount Emei Station and Taiyuan Station, and the accuracy of CERES-EBAF is higher than that of GEWEX-SRB. GLASS-DSR and CERES-EBAF over the period from 2008 to 2010 are also compared and analyzed. It is found that CERES-EBAF has a higher accuracy. Overall, these three radiation products all have a high accuracy. The underestimated sites are mostly located at high altitudes. The CERES-EBAF product covers a long time period with a relatively high accuracy, especially in eastern China and most of the coastal region in China.
主办单位:中国科学院大气物理研究所 单位地址:北京市9804信箱
联系电话: 010-82995048,010-82995049传真:010-82995048 邮编:100029 Email:qhhj@mail.iap.ac.cn
本系统由北京勤云科技发展有限公司设计
京ICP备09060247号